The THIRD SIDE of the argument

by Neville Fowler
(Sandstone Point, Queensland, Australia)

If the 'be' in 'bereshit', the first Hebrew word in the bible, is dropped a completely different translation of Genesis 1 is made. Similarly using the Ancient Hebrew Lexicon produces a different text.

Genesis 1:1 The chief prepared the Angels, the heavens and the Earth.
Genesis 1:2 would state ' The Earth existed, chaotic , upside-down and vacant, darkness existed throughout the great expanse, the confusion of the Angels about the great expanse of water was softened.

The description of the preparation of the Earth then follows which is identical to the 'Hollow Earth Theory'

The question for both sides is "Is the third theory 'The Hollow Earth Theory' able to be compatible with both Science and Religion?"

Comments for The THIRD SIDE of the argument

Click here to add your own comments

Aug 26, 2014

Is the Hollow Earth Plausible?
by: Paul (Webmaster)

In short, no. No one needs me to explain why. Everybody already agrees that a hollow earth is neither scientific nor biblical.

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Creation Argument Invitation.

Home

Evolution

Creation

Faith

Miscellaneous

Science & Honesty

The Author

"I have been a biologist for a long time, and I hope I never stop getting shivers in my spine when I think about the beauty of how we come to know things in biology.

Biologists make predictions, then they go out into the field or the lab to see if their predictions hold up. When hundreds of predictions of this sort are fulfilled, a theory reaches the point where it becomes certain, at least on a broad level. And that is where we are with evolution."

– Falk, Darrel. Professor of Biology. Point Loma Nazarene University. California.